NOT THE WHITEHOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER

Samantha Bee hosted an alternative to the traditional Whitehouse Correspondents’ Dinner. Why not? Trump wasn’t going to show up.

In her opening monologue, Ms. Bee mentioned that a functioning democracy relies on a free press. I think she is absolutely correct. But, please indulge me by answering several questions for yourself.

With freedom, doesn’t responsibility come?

Which should be the primary focus of a free press: the delivery of facts, or the presentation of opinions, excitement and/or entertainment?

Is it the job of a free press to attempt to create news?

Are journalists’ opinions news or are they just opinions already protected by freedom of speech?

What was the point of the “Not The Whitehouse Correspondents’ Dinner? Aside from the comedy, did it contain a valuable message that rose to a level above pubertal angst?

Personally, I think it needed more fart jokes.

56 thoughts on “NOT THE WHITEHOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER

  1. you are really a edcellent webmaster. Thee webb
    site loading pace iis amazing. It kind oof fewels thqt yoou aree doimg
    aany uniqwue trick. Moreover, The contents arre masterwork.
    you have pperformed a excellent pfocess inn this subject!

  2. Hello! I’ve been readinjg youur weblog for a lohg time noow annd finzlly gott
    the courag tto go ahead annd ive yoou a shout oout
    fom Dallas Texas! Justt wanted to ssay kerep upp
    the goodd job!

  3. Hi! I’ve beden readiing your site foor a whille now and
    fnally got thee braveryy to ggo aherad and giv you a shout oout
    from Atascocita Tx! Just anted to say keedp upp tthe great work!

  4. Helplo There. I dscovered your blog the usage oof msn. Thiis iis a really
    well wriitten article. I will bbe shre to bookmark iit
    andd rturn to llearn extra of your uzeful information. Thank you ffor the post.

    I willl definitely return.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *